<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delegates &#8212; pledged and otherwise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remmet.com/2008/03/06/delegates-pledged-and-otherwise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remmet.com/2008/03/06/delegates-pledged-and-otherwise/</link>
	<description>A blog with regard for history and rebellion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia Johnsen</title>
		<link>http://remmet.com/2008/03/06/delegates-pledged-and-otherwise/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sylvia Johnsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remmet.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another article build on a basic truth that Obama won delegates, but reality is that 3/4 delegates he won was in caucuses and you can argue against that system? Obama won on a different plattform than what he came out with. Politically there is very little left of the 3 pillars of the Obama campaign: Hope, Bridging the divide and Change. Clinton did not hurt the same way. She tied Obama, but kept her message. Clinton did not run negative (other than the 3 Am-ad which again is on message of experience), she won 9 of 14 primaries and in the end got more popular votes. Dems have more than enough reasons to vote for Clinton, but most important she represent them better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another article build on a basic truth that Obama won delegates, but reality is that 3/4 delegates he won was in caucuses and you can argue against that system? Obama won on a different plattform than what he came out with. Politically there is very little left of the 3 pillars of the Obama campaign: Hope, Bridging the divide and Change. Clinton did not hurt the same way. She tied Obama, but kept her message. Clinton did not run negative (other than the 3 Am-ad which again is on message of experience), she won 9 of 14 primaries and in the end got more popular votes. Dems have more than enough reasons to vote for Clinton, but most important she represent them better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

